Table of all public deliverables of the SUPERSEDE project
|ID||Deliverable name||Short description||Short name of lead particip.||Delivery date||Download|
|D1.1||Feedback management and monitoring approaches||Deliverable D1.1 presents the evaluation results of relevant feedback management and monitoring approaches, as well as online sources for feedback.|
Our studies reveal that researchers and practitioners have developed several tools and methods to support feedback management and monitoring. In total, we identified, analysed and discussed more than 100 approaches. We found that there is a lack of combined approaches, which consider both end-user feedback and monitoring information for decision-making in software projects. This highlights the need for the work planned to be done within SUPERSEDE.
|University of Zurich||September 2015||Download|
|D2.1||Data management v1||Deliverable D2.1 provides insights on the definition of the Big Data Management Platform for SUPERSEDE.|
Driven by the set of system requirements and functional areas, a conceptual reference architecture has been designed, whose goal is to target all the functional areas concerning SUPERSEDE. Such architecture, named Bolster, is a refinement of the well-known λ- architecture for big data systems.
The outcome of this deliverable provides a baseline to start the implementation of the big data platform for SUPERSEDE, and to leverage it in the work packages that there exist more dependencies with
|D2.2||Data management plan – 2nd version||The second version of the data management plan corresponds to the first software release in WP2. There are two main outcomes as part of this deliverable:|
A more detailed description on the architecture presented in the firs data management plan, and its specificities within SUPERSEDE. The description of a part of the Big Data governance protocol, which will provide adaptable and flexible mechanisms to store feedback and monitoring data.
|D3.1||Requirements for methods and tools||In this deliverable we present the results of a thorough use case (UC) analysis, which has been performed during the first three months of the project.|
Following a systematic approach, the analysis focused on an investigation of the as-is situation for all the three UCs, which concern the SIEMENS’ ECO System Platform for a smart city, the SEnerCon’s energy saving app, and the ATOS’ SMART Player for sport event webcasting. A first set of user stories were formulated that are the basis for further discussion and for the definition of to-be scenarios, which will include methods and tools to be developed in SUPERSEDE.
|D3.2||DM processes v1||This deliverable has the objective of describing the analysis of the decision making processes that are currently performed in the different SUPERSEDE use cases in order to cope with the problems related to the evolution and adaptation of running systems.|
A state-of-the-art analysis has been performed in order to identify the decision making methods proposed and evaluated in the recent literature. Then a suitable modelling language has been identified for the description of the decision making processes and of the different decision making tools
|D4.1||Methods and tools to enact software evolution v1||The objective of this deliverable is to determine the related works available for software release planning using optimization algorithms. With this objective in mind, this deliverable will be based on performing an academic literature review, a selection of a framework of optimization algorithms for the future implementation, and a market study to determine the available tools for release planning.|
The second objective of D4.1 is the description of the architecture for the tool that will be produced as part of the T4.1. This architectural description will include precise description of the architectural decisions made (such as the selection of technologies), and architectural views including other components from the scientific WPs to show the feasibility of the scientific WPs integration.
|D4.4||Methods and tools to enact software adaptation and personalization v1||This document provides a first specification (both functional and technical) of the Software Adaptation and Personalization Enactment framework (hereafter the Enactment framework). This framework collaborates with other Supersede frameworks in supporting run-time adaptation and personalization of software systems, driven altogether by the MAPE-K feedback loop.||ATOS||January 2016||Download|
|D4.7||Feedback-gathering and monitoring reconfiguration techniques v1||This deliverable is organised into two main parts. The first part (sec. 3), describes the results produced in T4.3, which includes: an analysis of the needs for feedback gathering reconfiguration, which is performed with the use of scenarios inspired from the three project’s use cases; definitions of feedback gathering method configuration and reconfiguration; and a description of an approach to support the design of a reconfigurable feedback gathering method, as well as of feedback gathering methods that can reconfigure autonomously at run-time. For this last aspect monitoring requirements are used.|
The second part (sec. 4), describes the results produced in T4.4. It includes: an analysis of the needs for monitoring reconfiguration in SUPERSEDE; a set of definitions useful to describe the problem of monitoring reconfiguration; types of solutions as emerging from a state-of-the art analysis; and an early architecture.
|D5.5||Tool Suite Implementation, v2||This report provides a functional and technical description of the second version of the SUPERSEDE Tool Suite Implementation software. The tool suite has been created by integrating components released by work-packages WP1, WP2, WP3 and WP4 at M18 into a single system by means of two base frameworks, the Integration Framework (IF) and the Front-End (FE).||DELTA||December 2016||Download|
|D7.1||Dissemination Plans v1||This document is the core document for all envisaged communication and dissemination activities of the SUPERSEDE consortium throughout the project lifetime. At the same time this document lists all dissemination activities undertaken in the first six months of the project.||SEnerCon||September of 2015||Download|
|D7.6||IPR Plan||This document describes a practical plan for the management of intellectual property rights (IPR) in SUPERSEDE. The goal of Task 7.4 is to define exploitation and IPR plan. Only the IPR Plan is covered by this document. It is worth to be noticed that the preparation of this deliverable has offered the occasion to all the partners, and especially the industrial partners, to exchange their ideas on this critical matter for defining suitable exploitation strategies.||SIEMENS||May 2015||Download|